The Lack Of Critical Thinking In Our Colombian Students
Today, Colombian students lack critical thinking. This has been happening for many decades and many claim that the Colombian government is incapable of training students towards a critical thinking that allows them to transform their reality. On the other hand, there are some who affirm that the education our students are receiving is the correct one for our development. However, It is my dissent that our students cannot think critically because teachers are not imbued with a critical thinking that could give students the skills and attitudes necessary to become critical thinkers.
It has been argued that students go to schools to become more intellectual people. People who can transform their reality and solve problems. However, our recent history in the field of education has shown that our students are incapable of coming up with solutions. This is in part because our teachers have been indoctrinating our students into becoming greedy young capitalists. This is happening owing to the fact that our students are influenced by a democracy which has allowed the market values become the template for shaping all aspects of society even our educational system. In happening this, our students are enslaved under this new form of slavery that keeps them out of critical thinking as Henry Giroux states in his Critical Pedagogy lecture at McMaster University. " the free possessive individual has not obligation to anything beyond his self-interest. Market fundamentalism trumps democratic essays. Consumerism becomes the only obligation of citizenship.
There are others factors which influence on the student's ability to think critically. Another of them according to Peter Macclaren, is that teachers have seen schools as arenas of indoctrination where the aim is to reproduce dominant class interest directed at creating obedient, docile and low-paid future workers… (Mclaren, pg. 62) so, to that extent, students are incapable of thinking critically. Another important reason, it is that teachers are instructing students with huge amounts of content without having in mind the question " what this knowledge will be useful for? By not doing this, much of the knowledge and time that teacher provide is being wasted. So, students lose their first ages learning useless content and start becoming lazy learners.
As a consequence of this, students do not develop the skill to resolve social issues. For the only purpose of them under educational instruction is the competitiveness and the repetition of knowledge. This even knowing that the purpose of a critical student is to struggle for a better life for all throughout the construction of a society based on equal relations and social justice. In many cases, students are not to blame for their lack of critical thinking because their mind has been fossilised through the years with useless schools subjects which stayed in forgiveness because they were never brought to practice.
In conclusion, I must say that, on one hand, teachers are to blame because they lack critical thinking to teach children to become critical thinkers. On the other hand, they are not to blame because they are under a capitalist system that only cares about buying and selling. In addition to this, it also makes them act and teach according to this law system. Besides and more importantly is the fact that, students are the ones who are paying the high cost for the quality of education they receive. This is due to the fact that they are not being training by teachers to acquire skills and attitudes which can help them to become critical thinkers. Skills and attitudes that can help them to transform their reality.
FEEDBACK:
ResponderEliminarFirst of all, I would like to see (if possible) an outline with the question, the thesis statement and the subsequent ideas to be addressed throughout your paper. It is a good way of organizing your ideas prior to writing a first draft of an essay.
Now, bearing in mind the ideas hereby shared, I think the following:
1. In the introductory paragraph, there is a question (mentioned towards the end of it) where the reader gets a sample of your subsequent arguments. However, the introduction itself seems full of statements that do not really match the purposes of the question stated. Try to center on what you want to mention initially and include any consequence in the rest of your paper.
2. Rewrite the introduction and make it more specific. It seems to broad.
3. Revise the terms you use throughout your paper. In the intro, you talk about foreign pedagogies. Nonetheless, you do not really make reference to any of them and I am not quite sure (personally speaking) if that is what you want to develop in your essay.
4. Re-read your outline before submitting it on your blog. It has spelling mistakes that takes away the reader's attention.
5. Look for sources that help you support your ideas. The authors we have reviewed in class will help you a lot with this.
Best regards,
Jhon Losada